For over eighty-five years, America has been incrementally conquered by the same madness-inducing demon of hatred and violence that earlier took over Russia, China, Germany, and Italy.  Rabbi Aryeh Spiro concurs, “There is a madness in today’s liberal thinking.  It insists on policies that tie our hands to defend ourselves while given free reign to the jihadists intent on killing us.  It is dangerous because it is becoming the law, and thinking of the land in the western world.  (Liberal Madness is Deadly, www.caucusforamerica.com (1/24/08)

This demon is embodied in “enlightened” Liberals and the West’s transnational “elite,” both of which are deeply infected by materialistic Communism (Cultural Marxism) and the delusion that the true enemy of America is always on the Right.  Having rejected God and the religious heritage of our civilization, they embrace instead a new order of beliefs of which Communism and Socialism are logical expressions.  A new world order is what they seek, but in order that it can emerge, the existing culture must be completely destroyed.

And what is Communism?  Using the former Soviet Union as an example, Frank Meyers describes it as, “The state form taken by a materialist faith determined to rule the world.”    Communism or scientific materialism is “the final synthesis of all heretical tendencies that have pervaded Western civilization for many centuries.”  It is materialist scientism, of which, “Communism is the culminating hubris of the Promethean man who reaches out for the world and means to remake creation.  It is scientism gone political.” (The Conservative Intellectual Movement, pp. 251-252)

We are All Materialists Now

“An age of science is necessarily an age of materialism,” declared Hugh Elliot early last century, “Ours is a scientific age, and it may be said with truth that we are all materialists now.”  (Darwin Day in America, John G. West, xiv)

 Materialist faith, or scientific materialism, has virtually displaced America’s founding Judeo-Christian worldview with the result that materialism is now the operative assumption for much of our government, culture, politics, law, etc.  Materialist operatives now control every public institution in the United States.  According to the inner logic of materialist faith, “we the people” are nothing but socially-constructed atomized robots which can presumably be deconstructed and melted into an atomized mass.  Toward both this goal and to raise up an army of street thugs who will destroy our culture, materialist change-agents use our education system to subvert and convert the minds of our youth.  Should they succeed in thoroughly corrupting them and in turning their hearts to hate, this generation of children may become the next Khmer Rouge, who at Pol Pot’s order murdered nearly two-million people, including their own families.

What is Materialism?

As Robert Jastrow (b. 1925), recipient of NASA’s Medal for Exceptional Studies explains, there are only two possible explanations for the origin of life:  evolution and creation.

“…science has no…answer to the question of the origin of life on earth.  Perhaps (life) is a miracle.  Scientists are reluctant to accept that view, but their choices are limited:  either life was created…by the will of a being outside…scientific understanding, or it evolved…spontaneously through chemical reactions…in nonliving matter…The first theory…is a statement of faith in the power of a Supreme Being not subject to the laws of science.   The second theory is also an act of faith (which assumes) that the scientific view…is correct, without having concrete evidence to support that belief.”  (Until the Sun Dies, Jastrow, 1977, pp. 62-63)

America is founded on the Judeo-Christian creation model.   Materialist faith rises or falls on the assumptions of metaphysical materialism and evolution.         

Materialism belongs to the family of Naturalism, which refers to the view that nature (or matter) is the Ultimate Substance of which the universe and all life are made, thus “all is one.”   C. S. Lewis describes naturalism as a box with its top sealed tightly closed in order to keep out God and the supernatural realm.  The ancient Ionians, Babylonians, Egyptians, and Aztecs were, for example, naturalists.  In this view there is but one realm (the material or natural) as opposed to Judeo-Christianity’s creation model with its two interacting realms: natural and supernatural.

There are two basic kinds of Naturalism:  materialism (i.e., Communism) and pantheism (i.e., Nazism and New Age Spiritual Communism).  The two kinds differ chiefly about whether the First Cause or Absolute Substance is nonliving, non-intelligence bearing matter or an unknowing, unknowable, amoral mind.  However, both kinds are united by their rejection of the transcendent, personal God and the supernatural realm and by their acceptance of some form of evolution, which serves as an impersonal, mechanical process of development. 

Birth of Scientific Materialism: A Brief Historical Overview

As will be shown by the following overview, scientific materialism is not founded on empirical science, as has been its deceptive claim, but rather on metaphysics.

In the main, modern materialism originated in the metaphysics of the ancient Ionians and Stoics during the sixth century BC.  However, it was the Atomists (Leucippus/Democritus, 460-357 BC; Epicurus, 342-270 BC; and Lucretius, 96-55 BC) who methodically developed materialism.

Forged in a furnace of narcissism, envy, and contempt, Atomism was from its inception an antihuman abomination which in later years, would attract those who enjoy the control and domination of others.   Atomism set all things in ceaseless, purposeless motion by reducing everything---including man, his soul, and even his thoughts---to mindless atoms perpetually colliding with each other in a void.  Man was reduced to a soulless, mindless machine that could only ‘see’ a tree because the tree emitted atoms which entered machine-man’s eyes and implanted themselves onto his brain.  This view has changed very little:

“We are descended from robots, and composed of robots…”   --Daniel C. Dennett, Kinds of Minds

Plato and Aristotle were the most forceful and compelling critics of Atomism.  In Book X of Laws, Plato indicts the Atomists for reversing the natural order, which they did by placing dead matter before Nous (mind/soul), and for the reductionism that sets everything in motion and reduces man to a machine.  Plato foresees only misery, social disintegration and ultimately, “the ruin of both states and families” should Atomism become the accepted view.

Though Christianity reared a mighty barrier against Atomism, it would be resurrected--- along with the hylozoism of the Ionians and Stoics---during the Renaissance by among others, pantheist Giordano Bruno and the heretic Paracelsus, an alchemist described by C.S. Lewis as a magician in his book, The Abolition of Man.   

Hylozoism (Greek hyle=nature; zoe-life) is the doctrine according to which all of nature’s bodies (i.e., sun, earth, moon, trees, man) possess life, mind, soul, and even divinity.   By infusing Atomism with Ionian hylozoism, what might be called materialzoism was invented by Bruno, Paracelsus, and others.   In short, dead matter was not just brought to life but deified.

The Franco-Germanic Enlightenment

With “God dead” and the source of man’s humanity (mind/soul) expropriated by materialists and conferred upon “dead matter,” a rush to discover the key that unlocks the mystery to life and mind was ignited which in later years unleashed unspeakable evil.  For in believing that without a doubt, they now possessed the gnosis (secret knowledge) to not only design a utopia but create a New Man with a reprogrammed mind and conscience, Nazi and Soviet scientists performed sadistic experiments on living human beings.  It was of these later scientific materialists that C.S. Lewis wrote his book, “The Abolition of Man.”  Even now, wrote Lewis, the process to “abolish Man goes on apace among Communists and Democrats (and) Fascists.”  The methods, said Lewis, may at first differ in brutality.  But “enlightened” materialists from scientists to philosophers to academe and to political leaders mean, in the long run, “Just the same as the Nazis…”  The West and America are to be destroyed and “mankind to be cut out in some fresh shape at the will” of scientific materialists who Lewis calls the Conditioners and Innovators.  These people, noted Lewis, are no longer men, for they have stepped out into the void. 

 Among the horde of Prometheans who set out to discover the animating-power of machine-man was Giovanni Aldini, who performed macabre experiments on decapitated oxes, horses, lambs, and---once he had overcome his repugnance, on humans.  For his experiments, he procured the freshest specimens possible by placing himself “under the scaffold, near the axe of justice…”  Believing that some type of electricity was the source of machine-mans animation, Aldini applied electricity to various parts of decapitated human heads.  This produced “the most horrid grimaces (but the) action of the eyelids was exceedingly striking.”  Aldini rationalized his repugnant experiments by saying that only the “unenlightened part of mankind (will be) apt to entertain a prejudice…”  (Darwin Day in America, p. 15)

Yet more power-crazed Prometheans emerged.  Julien de la Mettrie (1709-51), Paul Henri Thiery, and Baron D’Holbach (1723-89) all agreed that the mind is the property of dead matter and man nothing but a machine.  La Mettrie speculated that machine-mans rational life is entirely determined by physical causes that run the gamut from raw meat, to climate, blood circulation, and gender.  Genetic inheritance, posits la Mettrie, causes machine-man to commit crime.  This view casts parents into the role of “first cause” and would later manifest itself in the belief that State ‘experts,’  or Hillary’s “village” experts should have control of children.   (ibid, pp. 16-18)

Pierre Simon Laplace (1749-1827) viewed scientific materialism as not only the pursuit of God-like omniscience but of the Holy Grail itself---power to create a New Man.   If an intelligence could grasp “at a given instant…all the forces by which nature is animated” proclaimed Laplace, it could devise a mathematical formula that would predict everything that would ever happen, and “nothing would be uncertain, and the future, like the past, would be open to its eyes.”  Scientists should reduce everything in the universe to mechanical laws that could be expressed in terms of mathematics, advised Laplace, for the promise of such knowledge was incredible power…even over life and mind itself.  (ibid, p. 20)

Herbert Spencer, Fechner, Lotze, Wundt, and pantheist Ernst Haeckel, inventer of the scientism dictum---ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny---all agreed that life and mind are properties of dead matter.  Haeckel moreover imagined ether to be the primitive life-making substance which, as was the case with the primitive fire of the Stoics, changed one part of itself into inert mass while the other part became the active principle, spirit.  Today, many scientists routinely resort to Haeckel’s postulate without ever inquiring into its pantheist implications.

Haeckel would later write, “Pantheism teaches that God and the world are one…pantheism is…an advanced conception of nature (and) a polite form of atheism.”  The truth of pantheism, confessed Haeckel, “lies in its destruction of the dualist antithesis of God…”  The godless world system being constructed, said Haeckel, “substantially agrees with the monism or pantheism of the modern scientist.”  (Monism, Ernst Haeckel, www.pantheist.net/)

During the century to follow, Charles Darwin (1809-82) would help spread materialism to the masses.   As Stephen Jay Gould argues, “Darwin applied a consistent philosophy of materialism to his interpretation of nature, “and “the ground of all existence; mind, spirit, and God (are reduced to) neural complexity.” (ibid, p. 41)

According to Darwin, natural selection and the laws of heredity acting on matter produced mind, morality, and civilization.  By describing how deified natural mechanisms caused the complexity of life to emerge from deified matter, Darwin helped transform materialism from a fantastically bizarre tale told by power-mad Prometheans on the fringe of society to a hallowed scientism principle enshrined and worshipped by modern scientism and ‘enlightened’ Westerners.

It was during this time that Social Darwinism, Progressivism, Socialism, Communism (Cultural Marxism, New Left), Nazism, and Secular Humanism were developed out of metaphysical materialism.  Classical Liberalism on the other hand, was subverted and corrupted by the materialist faith into what is now known as modern Liberalism.  Of these, Communism (Marx and Engel’s dialectical materialism), is considered to be the most highly developed philosophy of materialism.  It rests on three fundamental metaphysical presuppositions:

1.      Deified Matter:  The Ultimate Substance which, though non-living, non-intelligent, and non-conscious, nevertheless somehow possesses the emergent properties of life, mind, consciousness, and soul.

2.      Evolution: Since Marxist dialectic requires a theory with clashes (thesis and antithesis) and leaps (synthesis), Marxists have all but abandoned Darwinism and instead have embraced punctuated equilibrium. “Many people confound dialectic with the theory of evolution,” noted G. Plekhanov. ”Dialectic is, in fact, a theory of evolution.  But it differs profoundly from the vulgar (Darwinian) theory of evolution.” (Fundamental Problems of Marxism, 1929, p. 145)

3.      Spontaneous Generation: An offshoot of specifically Darwinian thought accepted unreservedly by Marxists as their dialectic requires a strictly materialist explanation for the origin of life from dead matter.  In the words of M.A. Leonov:  “Marxist philosophical materialism remains beyond all doubt that at some time or other in the remote past, life must have arisen from non-living matter.” (Outline of Dialectical Materialism, 1948, p. 494)

In a modified version of the Stoic conception of the earth as a living organism possessed of its own soul, neo-pantheist dialectical materialism declares that earth is “one entire organism…its organs the various races and nations of men.”  Not only is the earth alive and evolving upward on evolution’s magical escalator, but so too are history and society, for they also are living entities in a continuous state of motion.  And man?  In a modified conception of Atomism’s extremely dehumanizing view of man, dialectical materialism states that man is nothing but “a colonial aggregation of cells,” and to “consider him an individual would be an error.”  Man---the aggregate of cells--- is nothing but an extension of society, history, and earth.  (Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics, Chapter II: The Constitution of Man as a Political Organism)

Death of America?

 Modern materialist states began by rejecting God and denying objective standards of right and wrong.  They threw out sanctity of life and demonically reduced man to matter in motion.   The end case, in every instance, was to place absolute power over  “atomized masses” into the hands of psychopaths and autocratic states to be wielded without restraint or mercy.  

Of all religions, the materialist faith has been by far the bloodiest.  In his book, Death by Government, R.J. Rummel comprehensively details the roughly 170 million people murdered by materialist governments during the 20th century.  From 1917 to its collapse in 1991, the Soviet Union liquidated about 62 million.  During Mao Tse-tung’s reign, 35,236,000 were murdered.  Hitler’s Nazi’s killed 21 million.    Even at its mildest, as is thus far the case here in America, there is a steady level of confiscation, corruption, fraud, and stifling of freedoms and free speech.  For the first time ever, Americans are afraid of saying certain words.  Parents fear disciplining their own children.  More ominously, materialists in control of America (i.e., ACLU, activist judges) have rejected God and thrown out both sanctity of life and objective standards.  “We the people” have been reduced to atomized beings.   Totalitarianism and genocide loom just over our horizon.

As early as 1926, President Calvin Coolidge was aware of and deeply concerned by the insidious spread scientific materialism in America.  As he knew, Americans are free only because of the Judeo-Christian foundation laid by the country’s founders.  In a speech he delivered in Philadelphia, July 5, 1926 to commemorate the 150^th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, Coolidge tried to call American’s back to their Judeo-Christian heritage.  He told Americans that the Declaration’s principles of liberty arise from man’s God-given inalienable rights.  And these are found, said Coolidge, “in the texts, the sermons, and the writings of the early colonial clergy…”  The clergy preached equality “because they believed in the fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man.”  Sanctity of life, the right to self-defense, and all the rest of our individual liberties were justified “by the text that we are all created in the divine image, all partakers of the divine spirit.”  God’s children therefore, have no “superiors;” there are no modern-day “divine rights kings” who possess “any right to rule…over them.”  Americans are free to choose their own leaders.

The Declaration, continued Coolidge, is “a great spiritual document.”  Its principles are not material but spiritual.  “Equality, liberty, popular sovereignty, the rights of man---these are not elements we can see and touch.  They are ideals (whose) source and roots (are) in religious convictions.  They belong to the unseen world.”

President Coolidge cautioned Americans that, “unless the faith of the Americans in these religious convictions is to endure, the principles of our Declaration will perish.  We can not continue to enjoy the result if we abandon the cause.”

Coolidge ended his speech with a stark warning, “We must not sink into a pagan materialism…”   (Back Fired, William Federer, pp. 269-271)

Yet, believing they are “enlightened” and “scientific,” maddened Liberals and Transnational “elites” are leading America over the Gadarene Cliff.

Copyright Linda Kimball 2008                                                                    PatriotsandLiberty.com/  http://patriotsandliberty.com/

Additional Sources:

Red Sea of Academe?  Walter Williams, Washington Times, 8/28/06 

Materialism, newadvent.org/

Hylozoism, newadvent.org/

Linda is the author of numerous published essays on culture, politics, and worldview.  Her writings are published both nationally and internationally.  Linda is a member of the MoveOff organization and a New Media Alliance member.                                                                                                                                     

In addition to original Darwinism, today there are two other versions of evolutionary theory: punctuated equilibrium and neo-Darwinism, a revamped version of the original Darwinism. No matter the variant though, evolution serves as the creation myth for the theological and philosophical worldview of Evolutionary Humanism (Naturalism).

“Evolution is a religion,” declared evolutionary Humanist Michael Ruse. “This was true of evolution in the beginning and it is true still today…One of the most popular books of the era was ‘Religion Without Revelation,’ by Julian Huxley, grandson of Thomas Huxley…As always evolution was doing everything expected of religion and more.” (National Post, Canadian Edition, 5/13/2000)

“Humanism is a philosophical, religious, and moral point of view.” (Humanist Manifestos I & II, 1980, Introduction, Paul Kurtz)

The primary denominations of Evolutionary Humanism are Cultural Marxism/Communism, Secular Humanism, Postmodernism, and Spiritual Communism. The offshoots of these are among others, New Age/green environmentalism/Gaia, socialism, progressivism, liberalism, multiculturalism, and atheism. Individually and collectively, these are modernized versions of pre-Biblical naturalism (paganism).

All worldviews begin with a religious declaration. The Biblical worldview begins with, “In the beginning God…” Cosmic Humanism begins, “In the beginning Divine Matter.”

Communism, Postmodernism, and Secular Humanism begin with, “In the beginning Matter.” Matter is all there is, and it not only thinks, but is Divine:

“…matter itself continually attains to higher perfection under its own power, thanks to indwelling dialectic…the dialectical materialists attribution of ‘dialectic’ to matter confers on it, not mental attributes only, but even divine ones.” (Dialectical Materialism, Gustav A. Wetter, 1977, p. 58)

In explicitly religious language, the following religionists offer all praise, honor, and glory to their Creator:

“We may regard the material and cosmic world as the supreme being, as the cause of all causes, as the creator of heaven and earth.” (Vladimir Lenin quoted in Communism versus Creation, Francis Nigel Lee, 1969, p. 28)

“The Cosmos is all that is or ever will be.” (Carl Sagan, Cosmos, 1980, p. 4)

Evolutionary Humanism has demonstrated itself to be an extremely dangerous worldview. In just the first eighty-seven years of the twentieth century, the evolutionist project of radically transforming the world and mankind through the power of evolutionism has led to the extermination of between 100-170 million ‘subhuman’ men, women, and children.

Deadly Problems

First, in order that materialist ethics be consistent with the idea that life evolved by chance and continues to evolve over time, ethics must be built on human social instincts that are in a continuous process of change over evolutionary time. This view demolishes both moral ethics and social taboos, thereby liberating man to do as he pleases. Over time this results in a lawless climate haunted by bullies, predators, despots, psychopaths, and other unsavory elements.

Perhaps Darwin could not envision the evil unleashed by his ideas. Nonetheless, he did have some inkling, for he wrote in his “Autobiography” that one who rejects God,

“…can have for his rule of life…those impulses and instincts which are strongest or…seem to him the best ones.” (Fatal Fruit, Tom DeRosa, p.7)

Humanist Max Hocutt realizes that materialist ethics are hugely problematical, but offers no solution. An absolute moral code cannot exist without God, however God does not exist, says Hocutt. Therefore,

“…if there were a morality written up in the sky somewhere but no God to enforce it, I see no reason why we should obey it. Human beings may, and do, make up their own rules.” (Understanding the Times, David Noebel, p. 138-139)

Jeffrey Dahmer, a psychopath who cannibalized his victims, acted on Darwin’s advice. In an interview he said,

“If a person doesn’t think there is a God to be accountable to, then…what is the point of trying to modify your behavior to keep it within acceptable ranges? That’s how I thought…I always believed the theory of evolution as truth, that we all just came from the slime.” (Dahmer in an interview with Stone Phillips, Dateline NBC, 11/29/1994)

With clearly religious overtones, atheist philosopher Bertrand Russell summarizes the amoral materialist ethic:

“Blind to good and evil, reckless of destruction, omnipotent matter rolls on its relentless way.” (Russell, “Why I am not a Christian and Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects,” 1957, p. 115)

Next, materialist epistemology and metaphysics dispossesses man of soul, free will, conscience, mind, and reason, thereby dehumanizing (animalizing) man and totally destroying not only the worth, dignity, and meaning of human life, but the possibility of freedom. The essence of this annihilation is captured in the following quotes:

Man is “but fish made over…” declared biologist William Etkin (Pushing the Antithesis, Greg L. Bahnsen, p. 224). And his life is but a “partial, continuous, progressive, multiform and continually interactive, self-realization of the potentialities of atomic electron states,” explained J.D. Bernal (1901-1971), past Professor of Physics at the University of London (The Origin of Life, Bernal, 1967, xv). Furthermore, “The universe cares nothing for us,” trumpets William Provine, Cornell University Professor of Biology, “and we have no ultimate meaning in life.” (Scientists, Face It! Science and Religion are Incompatible,” The Scientist, Sept. 1988)

Man... “must be degraded from a spiritual being to an animalistic pattern. He must think of himself as an animal, capable of only animalistic reactions. He must no longer think of himself…as capable of ‘spiritual endurance,’ or nobility.” By animalizing man his “state of mind…can be ordered and enslaved.” (Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics, “Degradation and Shock,” Chapter viii)

Finally, Evolutionary Humanism posits the notion that despite the fact that man is “but fish made over…” there are in fact, some exceptions to this rule. For it happens---by chance of course---that some lucky ‘species’ and ‘races’ of the human animal are more highly evolved (superior) and therefore enlightened than the others, who are---unluckily for them---less evolved and as a consequence, subhuman. Paired to this view is the idea that if a species or race does not continue to evolve (progress up the evolutionary ladder), it will become extinct. Together, these ideas lead logically to the deadly conclusion that in order to preserve the fittest of the species---or the spiritually evolved, as is the case with Spiritual Communism--- it is morally incumbent upon the superior to replace (via the science of eugenics and population control) and/or liquidate the subhumans. In his book, “The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex,” (1871) Charles Darwin foresaw this eventuality:

“At some future period…the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world…the anthropomorphous apes…will no doubt be exterminated.” (Descent, 2^nd ed., p. 183)

In practice, the materialist worldview is a hellish recipe for catastrophe, as was amply demonstrated by the 20^th century’s two most blood-soaked political movements--- pagan Nazism and atheist Communism. Both rejected God, and both were animated by Darwinism

Nazi Germany

Hitler’s murderous philosophy was built on Darwinian evolution and preservation of favored species. In his book, “Evolution and Ethics, British evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith notes,

“The leader of Germany is an evolutionist not only in theory, but, as millions know to their cost, in the rigor of its practice.” (1947, p.230)

It was Darwinism that inspired Hitler to try to create---by way of eugenics--- a superior race, the Aryan Man. In pursuit of his ambition, Hitler eliminated what he considered were inferior human animals, among which were for example, Jews, Slavs, Gypsies, and Christians.

Evolutionism in Nazi Germany resulted in gas chambers, ovens, and the liquidation of eleven million “useless eaters” and other undesirables. Evolutionist Niles Eldridge, author of “Darwin: Discovering the Tree of Life,” reluctantly concurs. Darwin’s theory, he acknowledges,

“has given us the eugenics movement and some of its darker outgrowths, such as the genocidal practices of the Nazis.” (2005, p. 13)

The Soviet Union

Even though Karl Marx wrote his Communist Manifesto before Darwin published his “On the Species,” the roots of Communism are nonetheless found in Darwinism. Karl Marx wrote Fredrich Engels that Darwin’s ‘Origin’,

“is the book which contains the basis in natural science for our view.” (Marxian Biology and the Social Scene, Conway Zirkle, 1959)

Stephane Courtois, one of the authors of The Black Book of Communism, relates that,

“In Communism there exists a sociopolitical eugenics, a form of Social Darwinism.” (p. 752)

Vladimir Lenin exulted that,

“Darwin put an end to the belief that the animal and vegetable species bear no relation to one another (and) that they were created by God, and hence immutable.” (Fatal Fruit, Tom DeRosa, p. 9)

Lenin exercised godlike power over life and death. He saw himself as, “the master of the knowledge of the evolution of social species.” It was Lenin who “decided who should disappear by virtue of having been condemned to the dustbin of history.” From the moment Lenin made the “scientific” decision that the bourgeoisie represented a stage of humanity that evolution had surpassed, “its liquidation as a class and the liquidation of the individuals who actually or supposedly belonged to it could be justified.” (The Black Book of Communism, p. 752)

Alain Brossat draws the following conclusions about the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, and the ties that bind them:

“The ‘liquidation’ of the Muscovite executioners, a close relative of the ‘treatment’ carried out by Nazi assassins, is a linguistic microcosm of an irreparable mental and cultural catastrophe that was in full view on the Soviet Stage. The value of human life collapsed, and thinking in categories replaced ethical thought…In the discourse and practice of the Nazi exterminators, the animalization of Other…was closely linked to the ideology of race. It was conceived in the implacably hierarchical racial terms of “subhumans” and “supermen”…but in Moscow in 1937, what mattered…was the total animalization of the Other, so that a policy under which absolutely anything was possible could come into practice.” (ibid, p. 751)

21^st Century America

Ronald Reagan loved God and America. America he said is, “the moral force that defeated communism and all those who would put the human soul into bondage.” (Republican National Convention, Houston TX, 8/17/1992)

Even though he was optimistic about America’s future he nevertheless cautioned that America must maintain her reliance on God and her commitment to righteousness and morality. He liked quoting Alexis de Tocqueville’s insightful analysis of the source of America’s greatness:

“Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits flame with righteousness did I understand the secret and genius of her power. America is great because she is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.” (In the Words of Ronald Reagan, by Michael Reagan)

As America moves into the 21^st century, we have yet to admit a shameful, dark secret. Evolutionism…the creation myth, that empowered Nazism and Communism, is being taught to America’s youth in our government-controlled schools. The animalization of Americans is well advanced and coupled to a corresponding slow collapse of human worth. Already we hear of human life spoken of in dehumanizing categories such as ‘vegetable,’ “non-persons,” and ‘uterine content.’

Ominously, Evolutionary Humanism has also outstripped Judeo-Christian precepts in our universities, judiciary, federal bureaucracy, corporations, medicine, law, psychology, sociology, entertainment, news media and halls of Congress. As Biocentrism it fuels the nonhuman animal rights project, the gay rights movement, radical feminism, and the increasingly powerful and influential green environmentalist program, which demands that America submit to the draconian mandates of the Kyoto Treaty.

America, the “moral force that defeated communism” is on the verge of completely rejecting God, the natural order, and moral absolutes and instead, embracing the godless religion of evolution, amorality, and the unnatural.

Evolutionary Humanism is the most dangerous delusion thus far in history. It begins with the ‘animalization of Other,’ in tandem with the elevation of the ‘superior,’ for whom this serves as a license to make up their own rules, abuse power, and force their will onto the citizens. This is accompanied by a downward spiraling process that pathologizes the natural order, moral ethics, virtue, and social taboos while simultaneously elevating narcissism, tyranny, cruelty, nihilism, confusion, perversion, sadism, theft, and lying to positions of politically correct “new morality,” which is then enforced through sensitivity training, speech codes, hate crime laws, and other intimidation tactics. If not stopped, as history warns us, this rapidly escalating downward process leads inevitably to totalitarianism, enslavement, and eventually mass murder.

In a portent of things to come, evolutionist B.F. Skinner said:

“A scientific analysis of behavior dispossesses autonomous man and turns the control he has been said to exert over to the environment. The individual…is henceforth to be controlled…in large part by other men.” (Understanding the Times, David Noebel, p. 232)

Copyright Linda Kimball 2007

www.patriotsandliberty.com/

Linda is the author of many published essays on culture, worldview, and politics. Her essays are published both nationally and internationally. She is a member of MoveOff.org

The murderous secular humanist religions of Communism and Nazism were spawned by the anti-God/utopian tradition of Revolutionary France. The Black Book of Communism, an 800-page compendium of the crimes of Communist regimes worldwide, graphically details the terror, torture, man-made famine, mass deportations, starvation, and massacres undertaken on behalf of revolutionary utopian ideals. The reality of Communism, which claimed to be an emissary of the Enlightenment, of universal brotherhood, and of happiness for all as envisioned by Gracchus Babeuf, turned out to be not only a sadistic engine for unimaginable evil but also the creator of hells on earth.

The book’s authors point to Communism’s “biological and zoological strain of thinking” as the engine of evil that proved itself to be a most effective means of denying the humanity of Communism’s millions of victims. “This strain of thinking,” explained Stephane Courtois, “is why so many of the crimes of Communism were crimes against humanity, and how Marxist-Leninist ideology managed to justify these crimes to its followers.” (The Black Book of Communism; p. 751)

Biocentrism: the Biological/Zoological Strain of Thinking

Biocentrism or ecocentrism, terms synonymous with today’s sustainable development/global warming crowd, is the “biological and zoological strain of thinking” in disguise. Biocentrism is antithetical to America’s Judeo-Christian worldview in that it not only reduces man to a soulless ape, but makes his life less valuable than cockroaches, earthworms, spotted owls, trash fish, grizzlies, alligators, and wolves. Those who trace the genesis of ideas, such as Donald Worster, point to Charles Darwin as the most important spokesman for the biocentrism attitude. In short, Darwin’s theory of evolution, the malignant heart of biocentrism, leads to contempt and even hatred towards humanity.

“Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.”

(Earth First! Journal editor, John Daily)

“To feed a starving child is to exacerbate the world population problem.”

(Yale professor Lamont Cole)

Biocentrism and its morally-warped system of philosophy and morality thrive right here in America. Communism (multiculturalism/Cultural Marxism) and its diabolical mother, Secular Humanism, plus its twisted sisters, Postmodernism and Cosmic Humanism (New Age global warming crowd) are now the predominant way of thinking in most of America’s power centers. At the heart of each of these systems beats the black heart of Darwinian biocentrism.

Dr. James Dobson notes, “The Secular Humanist system…has outstripped Judeo-Christian precepts in the universities…judiciary…federal bureaucracy, in business, medicine, law, psychology, sociology…arts, in many public schools, and to be sure, in the halls of Congress.” (Understanding the Times; David A. Noebel; p. 7)

Every day in our public schools, America’s children are ‘animalized’ through the teaching of Darwinian evolutionary propaganda. Though some are able to resist this dehumanizing spiritual attack, many more are not. Of those who cannot, some will go on to join the ranks of anti-God, anti-America, anti-human revolutionaries, thereby becoming accomplices in the destruction of the nation that nourishes and protects them. Others will become practical atheists who, having no faith in God, will not fight for a nation founded on Judeo-Christian precepts. From a secular humanist point of view, these are desired outcomes because:

“The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States.”

….Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund

These things are occurring because for nearly two centuries Secular Humanists and revolutionary fellow travelers---having infiltrated and taken control of this nation’s education establishment--- incrementally replaced our nation’s founding Judeo-Christian moral and philosophical worldview and history with a revolutionary catechism. The effect of this has been to not only undermine and delegitimize our nation’s traditional ideas and institutions but to also reverse and upend the natural order, all of which is leading to the destruction of our civilization.

“To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots.”

…Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Teaching to this nation’s future leaders, jurists, lawmakers, government workers, teachers, etc., the ideas and philosophies of men and women such as Comte, Marx, Malthus, de Sade, Rousseau, Reich, Freud, Darwin, Nietzsche, Lenin, Stalin, Heidegger, Adorno, Lukacs, Gramsci, Sanger, Marcuse, Dewey, Kinsey, Derrida, and Foucault, for example, has unleashed a devastating wave of corruption, debauchery, political correctness, chaos, pathologies, crime, narcissism, raw power-grabbing, and abandonment of allegiance towards these United States of America, all of which paves the way for the rise of a socialistic, sustainably-developed New World Order.

An alternative power structure necessary for deconstructing our Constitutional Republic has been created. This ‘shadow government’ of interlocking relationships and mutually reinforcing agendas consists of, for example, the New Left, the Democratic machine, environmental organizations such as The Nature Conservancy, Sierra Club, Audubon Society, and The Wildlife Federation; big money foundations, such as Heinz, Mott, Blue Moon, Turner, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund; federal and state fish and wildlife departments, and of course, the United Nations. In hot pursuit of their North American Union project, the power and money hungry Transnational Right aids and abets the destructive process.

With the exception of the dissident voices of “intolerant, racist/haters” like Christians and other true Conservatives, the majority of Americans have passively acquiesced to being told that they are mindless, soulless apes. They also allow their children to be animalized and even told that as apes, they share a common heritage with earthworms. In light of this, the following question bears asking: Why should anyone, let alone the narcissists who are busily deconstructing our nation, respect and serve such a people?

If Antonio Gramsci were alive, he would be gratified by how well his plan for the slow and gradual destruction of America from the inside is working.

Agenda 21: The Utopian Fantasy

Agenda 21 was adopted at the 1992 UN Conference in Rio de Janeiro. This 300-page document contains 40 chapters loaded with recommendations to micro-manage virtually every facet of human existence. Agenda 21 is not a treaty but a “soft-law” policy document that does not require Senate ratification. Some of the key players involved in its production and adoption are Al Gore, Ted Turner, and Maurice Strong. President George HW Bush signed it and President Clinton issued Executive Order No. 12852, which created the President’s Council on Sustainable Development.

In his, “Sustainable Development: Transforming America,” Henry Lamb provides us with a vignette of the emerging utopia. Speaking only of America, he says:

“Half the land area of the entire country will be designated ‘wilderness areas’ where only wildlife managers and researchers will be allowed. These areas will be interconnected by ‘corridors of wilderness’ to allow migration of wildlife…Wolves will be as plentiful in Virginia and Pennsylvania as they are now in Idaho and Montana. Panthers and alligators will roam freely from the Everglades to the Okefenokee and beyond…Transportation between sustainable communities (islands of human habitation)…will be primarily by light rail systems…highways that remain will be super transport corridors, such as the “Trans-Texas Corridor” now being designed…” (Eco-logic Special Report, Dec. 1, 2005)

Property Acquisition Schemes

“The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence. If “Thou shalt not covet,” and “Thou shalt not steal,” were not commandments of Heaven, they must be made inviolable precepts in every society, before it can be civilized or made free.” …John Adams

(The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States; Charles Francis Adams, editor, Vol. VI, p.9)

The Wildlands Project, written by Dr. Reed Noss, who is under contract with The Nature Conservancy, is one such scheme. It has never been debated or voted on by elected officials. Nevertheless, it is being implemented through backdoor initiatives. Through its use thus far, 106.5 million acres have been acquire by being designated as wilderness since 1964.

Henry Lamb reports that not only is eminent domain a key ‘land-taking’ strategy but:

“In the West, the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management are driving ranchers off the land by reducing grazing allotments…people who have recreational cabins on federal land, are discovering that their permits are not being renewed. The Fish and Wildlife Service is forcing people off their land through designations of “wetlands,” and “critical habitat”…” (ibid)

The biocentric Endangered Species Act makes use of spotted owls, plants, trash fish, alligators, grizzlies, wolves, and more to run people off their land. Within the space of one week last year (2006), three young Florida women were attacked by so-called ‘managed’ alligators. All three women died gruesome deaths. ‘Managed’ wolves are likewise useful for terrorizing landowners, especially when said owners have been criminally deprived of the basic right of self-defense.

An article entitled, “Wolf Management Program Actions Show Children are Expendable,” in the wolfcrossing blog speaks of the outrage, despair, and sense of helplessness felt by landowners hand-cuffed by politically correct Dept.of Fish and Wildlife regulations that elevate the welfare of wolves over that of people, thus leaving them helpless in the face of marauding wolves.

Sister Flash writes, “Recently a little boy was encircled by Mexican wolves…the Luna pack circled him for more than five minutes.” One month later, wrote Sister Flash, the pack attacked a family dog as it followed its 8-year old owner (a girl) who was going to feed the families horses. Thirty days later, “the (same) little girl’s beautiful black quarter horse (Six) was trapped in his corral and brutally slaughtered by the same wolves…(More recently) a small dog named Maggie was attacked protecting her child’s play yard, right off the front porch…” (http://wolfcrossing.org/blog/?p=235)

Not only have the wolves not been removed, but the notorious alpha male---who had been relocated from Arizona to New Mexico for hanging around a schoolyard in Blue, AZ---has been declared “no longer a threat,” by the complicit New Mexico Department of Game and Fish.

“In the beginning, God created…” is the core presupposition on which Western civilization advanced for more than two millennia. Its highest expression is in our Declaration of Independence, where it serves as the ultimate source of our unalienable rights. This presupposition is condemned by most western policy makers and by the UN, all of whom prefer the biocentric view:

“Human happiness, and…fecundity, are not as important as a wild and healthy planet…until such time as homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along.”…David Graber, research biologist with the National Park Service

“…Christianity (has set) humans apart from nature (and) converted the world into a warehouse of commodities for human enjoyment.” (Global Biodiversity Assessment, p. 787)

In a chilling portent of things to come, M. Macnab, a respondent to the wolfcrossing article, spoke to all Americans when she warned:

“We here in ‘wolf recovery territory’ know all to well what horrible encroachments on our rights can occur when state and federal officials violate their true purpose. Life without basic rights to protecting one’s family and property is not at all pleasant and this careless and lawless disregard for others welfare will, if not checked…become the standard for all.” (ibid)

Copyright Linda Kimball 2007

Linda is the author of numerous published articles on culture, worldview, and politics. Her articles are published both nationally and internationally. She is a member of MoveOff.org.

Resources:

The Green Counter-Establishment: How It Holds Power; Bonner R. Cohen; Capital Research Center

Sustainable Development: Transforming America; Henry Lamb; Environmental Conservation Organization

The Importance of Morality and Religion in Government; WallBuilders.com

Al Gore, the United Nations, and the Cult of Gaia; Cliff Kinkaid; USAsurvival.org

Green Religion and Public Policy; Henry Lamb; Environmental Conservation Organization

In “The Historical Roots of ‘Political Correctness,’ author Raymond V. Raehn observed that America is “dominated by an alien system of beliefs, attitudes, and values that we have come to know as ‘Political Correctness.’  Political Correctness seeks to impose a uniformity of thought and behavior on all Americans and is therefore totalitarian in nature.  Its roots lie in a version of Marxism which seeks a radical inversion of the traditional culture in order to create a social revolution.” (www.freecongress.org)

Political Correctness and Multiculturalism are a modified version of Marxism formulated by the Frankfurt School.  The new version is simply Marxism translated from economic terms into cultural terms.  The proletariat is no longer the working class but cultural fringe elements such as man-hating females, members of the criminal element, and the ‘sexually confused,’ known in Marxist-speak as the ‘gay subspecies.’  The correct label for this modified version is Cultural Marxism.

Behind radical feminism, same-sex marriage, the androgyny theme, gay pride, and the overall pattern of degeneration at all levels of society throughout America and the West lies a revamped international Communist revolution.  Being anti-Stalinist it shuns the Communist label and instead disguises itself as Multiculturalism and Political Correctness.  Separation of church and state, pornography, easy divorce, open borders, extreme sex education, abortion, gay pride, same-sex marriage, androgyny, political correctness, speech codes, the wreckage of the traditional family, and hate crime laws---all were imported to the Christian West from the pre-Stalinist Soviet Union.  We did not recognize it as Communism because we believed Stalin’s modified version to be the original communism.

Pre-Stalinist Soviet Union

In analyzing Marxism, historian Arnold Toynbee revealed that it is a distinctly ’religious’ secular humanist inspiration whose God is the Goddess of Historical Necessity.  Marxism, states Toynbee, “is the apocalyptic vision of a violent revolution which is inevitable because it is the decree…of (the Goddess), and which is to invert the present roles of Proletariat and Dominant Majority…in a reversal of roles which is to carry the Chosen People…from the lowest to the highest place in the Kingdom of this World.” (A Study of History)

In other words, the patriarchal Christian culture was to be turned upside-down and the chosen ones---the proletariat and their subculture---placed into positions of dominance.  The new Kingdom was to be matrist and polymorphously perverse. 

In the pre-Stalinist Soviet Union, Bolshevik religious fanatics---believing they were “scientific high-priests” endowed with “God-like” creative powers---literally attempted to scientifically re-engineer not only a New Man but a polymorphously perverse Kingdom of this World where androgynous beings could move fluidly into and out of sexually-gratifying relationships.  Before they could begin this monstrously inhuman project, Marxists first had to deconstruct both man and his existing culture.

Nihilism in the Name of “Science---Amen!”

The first order of business was to ‘exorcise’ Elohim, Creator of the universe and the source of patriarchy.  This they attempted to do by declaring a ‘separation of church and state.’ “The Bolsheviks took power in 1917 and declared a separation of church and state.  Thus the Russian Orthodox Church found itself without official state backing for the first time in its history.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Orthodox_Church)

Abolishing the ‘oppressive’ patriarchal family came next.  Toward this end, universal moral law was tossed aside, wives and mothers were forced into factories, abortions made free, and divorces attained within minutes.  Catastrophe ensued:  “When the Bolsheviki came into power in 1917, they regarded the family…with fierce hatred and set out…to destroy it.  One must live in Russia today, amid the atmosphere of torment, disgust, and disillusionment that pervades sex relations, the chaos, uncertainty, and tragedy that hover over the Russian family…Some men have twenty wives, living a week with one, a month with another…Abortions cover our villages with shame.  Formerly we did not even hear of them.”  (The Russian Effort to Abolish Marriage, by a Woman Resident in Russia; Atlantic Monthly, Vol.138, No.1, pp 108-114, July 1926).

Bolsheviks ‘liberated’ thousands upon thousands of hapless children from their ‘oppressive’ families. Taking control of schools, they filled the heads of children with worthless propaganda, atheism, and extreme sex education.  Additionally, children were psychologically manipulated into not only turning against their own families, but into spying upon them as well.  The consequences were enormous:  devastated families, destroyed lives: child rapists, murderers, thieves, bullies, and outright sociopaths.

‘Equality’ (sameness) was created between “natural intercourse” and the paraphilias, including sodomy.  “Concerning…sodomy, and various other forms of sexual gratification, which are set down in European legislation as offenses against public morality---Soviet legislation treats these the same as so-called ‘natural intercourse.”  (Soviet Union in the 1920s: Scientific, Not Utopian” www.workers.org)

Like falling dominoes, the collapsing family led to the fall of social order, culture, and then the economy, unleashing a tidal wave of crime, corruption, sexual debauchery, and chaos.  When Stalin came to power, he took immediate steps to restore order.  The family and ethics were restored, abortion and divorce made difficult to obtain, and sodomy, gender-bendering, etc. were re-criminalized.  In taking these steps, Stalin destroyed the Bolshevik’s ‘revolution,’ for which they hate him to this day. 

Return of the Bolsheviks

A revitalized Bolshevik Left reorganized itself in the 1960s.  To distinguish itself from the Stalinist version of Communism, it dubbed itself the New Left. 

By the late 1960’s, the New Left’s Gramscian-style cultural revolution had begun in earnest in both America and the West.  Disguising malignant intent behind code words such as multiculturalism, diversity, tolerance, safe schools/safe sex, same-sex marriage, ‘gay’ rights, choice, and peace, New Left revolutionaries began taking America and the West down the path to familial and cultural suicide.  Partnered to their campaign of nihilism has been a relentlessly brutal assault on Christians, Orthodox Jews, conservatives, the military, and straight males (particularly white males) in which all are marginalized,  psychologically bullied and targeted as ‘homophobes, bigots, racists, fascists, intolerant, divisive, and mentally ill,” or in other words, “Enemies of the People.”

With the support of big money transnational progressive foundations and individuals like George Soros, and in cooperation with Leftist media, the UN and radical non-governmental organizations, the New Left has successfully taken their aggressive ‘social engineering’ revolution worldwide and is forcing the traditional family to the brink of destruction.  Now they seek to push it over the edge with the ‘same-sex marriage’ scheme.  Additionally, children are slowly but surely coming under control of the ‘global village’ and being atheitized and sexualized while parents are increasingly marginalized and terrorized. From behind the barricades of the phony ‘separation of church and state’ clause, Cultural Marxists are erasing the Christian heritage of America and the West while simultaneously engaging in a brutal psychological assault against Christians and Orthodox Jews. Harnessed to these crusades is one designed to create ‘sameness’ between natural intercourse and all varieties of sexual gratification.  This scheme goes by the name, ‘gay rights.’  And because all of the preceding is naturally abhorrent to people, draconian hate crime laws and speech codes are being legislated to enforce conformity and compliance. 

The New Left’s global revolution comes to light in the following examples:

1.      England: Don’t Abuse Gay Rights: In May last year, an Oxford student jokingly asked a police officer: Do you realize your horse is gay?  Two squad cars arrived, the student was arrested and kept overnight in a police cell.”  (www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk, 12/18/06)  Note: see UK’s Sexual Orientation Regulations here: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2003/20031661.htm )

2.      UN NGO: IGLHRC (International Gay, Lesbian Human Rights Commission) Calls the US Marriage Amendment an International Human Rights Violation (www.iglhrc.org/ 6/5/06)

3.      USA (Extreme Sex Educators): “Time Magazine, School Event Expose Massive Cultural Campaign to Promote Homosexuality to Children”…”We’re gonna win,” says (GLSEN founder Kevin) Jennings, “because of what’s happening in high schools right now.” (www.cwfa.org/ 10/7/05)

4.      Northern Ireland:  Lawyers Christian Fellowship to Rally against Sexual Orientation Regulations, “The government (widely criticized for) using…direct rule powers to fast-track (sexual orientation regulations).  (www.ChristianToday.com/ 12/23/06)

5.      London: Homophobia Spies in the Classroom, “Schools that fail to show enthusiasm in rooting out prejudice against homosexuals should be reported to police.”  (www.thisislondon.co.uk/ 12/28/06)

6.      England: January’s ‘The Pink News’ celebrates a good month for combating homophobia incitement with the conviction of Tory councilor Peter Willow and the Advertising Standard Authority’s investigation into an anti-gay Christian ad…The…litmus test for free speech is seeing if the vocabulary would work universally.”   (www.pinknews.co.uk/ 12/27/06)

7.      Germany: “Germany Uses Nazi Era Law to Imprison Mom for Homeschooling; Family Flees to Austria” (www.lifesite.net/ 9/14/06)

8.      USA: “Hate-Crime Legislation Reappears” (www.citizenlink.org/ 1/16/07)

9.      USA: “Pedophiles/Sex Torturers Seek Normalization”…In May, 2003, the American Psychiatric Assoc. met…to debate removing such paraphilias as pedophilia, transvestism, fetishism, voyeurism, and sadomasochism from the DSM (www.traditionalvalues.org)

10.  USA: ‘California Psychiatrist Wants ‘Extreme Bias’ against Homosexuality Added to DSM” (NARTH, 1/6/06)

Both Orthodox-Christian Russia and Poland suffered catastrophically, first at the hands of Bolshevik fanatics and then later, under Stalin.  Yet none of that matters to Cultural Marxist New Left sociopaths, for they have returned for ‘round two.’

1.      Poland: “Official Homophobia Threatens Basic Freedoms, “Poland’s leaders have stoked the fires of homophobic hatred to advance their political careers,” said Scott Long, director of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights Program at Human Rights Watch. (Human Rights Watch, 5/5/06)

2.      Russia:  “Mayor Luzhkov of Moscow Violates European Convention on Human Rights by Banning First Gay Pride Parade on May 27” (www.iglhrc.org/ 5/23/06)

Through utilization of a protracted stealth campaign to impose Cultural Marxism on America and the West, the New Left has succeeded in inverting our social, cultural, political, and moral order.  As a result, we now exist in an Orwellian ‘upside-down’ world where, as evil subterranean forces work tirelessly to subvert and pervert our children, abolish marriage, abort our future citizens (babies), throw open our borders, undermine our laws and in short, to utterly destroy our civilizations, the source of evil brazenly accuses the defenders of ‘home and hearth’ of being “intolerant, bigoted, sexist, racist, fascist, homophobic, and insane.”  This is like a sociopath accusing the morally upright man of being a sociopath.

The French philosopher and former Marxist, Bernard-Henri Levi astutely observed, “Apply Marxism in any country you want, you will always find a Gulag in the end.”

In league with transnational progressives, New Left fanatics are stealthily lowering the “iron curtain” upon the New Soviet Union---America and the West.   Political activism by conservatives, Christians, and all traditional-values patriots is no longer just a civic and moral duty.  It’s now a matter of our very survival.

Copyright Linda Kimball 2007

http://patriotsandliberty.com/

About Linda:  Linda is the author of numerous published articles and essays on culture, politics, and worldview.  Her articles are published both nationally and internationally.

Related Articles:

America’s Second Civil War

Bolshevik’s ‘Gay Pride’ Disaster and its Lesson for America

The New Left, Cultural Marxism, and Psychopolitics Disguised as Multiculturalism

Trotsky’s Permanent Revolution in America

Marxist Subversion and Perversion of America’s Youth

.   

“There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international…network which operates…in the way the radical right believes the Communists act…this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups…” (Prof. Carroll Quigley, mentor of Bill Clinton, in his opus, Tragedy and Hope; Source: A Chronological History: The New World Order, D.L. Cuddy, Ph.D)  

In a powerful composition entitled, “The Ideological War within the West,” author John Fonte cautions that, “Talk in the West of a ‘culture war’ is somewhat misleading because the arguments over transnational vs. national citizenship, multiculturalism vs. assimilation, and global governance vs. national sovereignty are not simply cultural, but ideological and philosophical.  They pose Aristotle’s question, “What kind of government is best?” (AsiaTimes Online, May 30, 2002)

Fonte identifies two separate, but not terribly distinct, ‘ideological and philosophical’ movements, each of which are working towards the ultimate goal of a ‘post-constitutional,’ ‘post-liberal,’ ‘post-democratic’ ‘post-American,’ and post-Christian authoritarian regime.  Fonte refers to these two movements as ‘transnational progressives’ and the ‘transnational right.’ 

Transnational Right

“I see a world of open borders, open trade…open minds; a world that celebrates…the common heritage that belongs to all the world’s people…I see a world where democracy continues to win new friends and convert old foes…where the Americas---North, Central, and South---can provide a model for the future of all humankind: the world’s first completely democratic hemisphere…a world building on the emerging new model of European unity…”(President George Bush I, in an address before the 45^th session of the UN General Assembly in New York)